I’ll never forget the evening a friend asked, only half-joking, ‘Who’s the most dangerous person you’ll ever meet?’ After a pause, he dropped the answer: ‘Your husband.’ It felt ridiculous—until I stumbled onto Dr. Gad Saad’s research. This blog post goes well beyond that dinner-table shock, inviting you to step into the shoes of an evolutionary psychologist, chase truths others tiptoe around, and look at humanity’s quirks with both skepticism and scientific wonder. Get ready for stories, stats, and the occasional tangent—because nothing about human nature is as straightforward as it seems.
A Dinner Conversation with Evolution: The Most Dangerous Person Revealed
Imagine you’re sitting at a dinner table, and someone suddenly asks, “Who is the most dangerous person a woman will ever meet in her life?” It’s a question that catches most people off guard. Your mind might race to images of strangers in dark alleys or notorious criminals. But as Dr. Gad Saad, a leading voice in Evolutionary Psychology, points out, the answer is far closer to home—and far more unsettling (0:00–0:10).
Statistically, research shows that a woman’s greatest threat isn’t a stranger, but her own husband or intimate partner. This claim, echoed in cross-cultural studies and highlighted by Saad, can feel deeply uncomfortable. Yet, it’s supported by decades of data, including the landmark homicide study by Daly & Wilson. Their research, spanning from the Yanomamö tribe in the Amazon to urban centers like Detroit, reveals a consistent pattern: the risk of intimate partner violence is dramatically higher than the risk posed by strangers (13:37–13:59).
This isn’t just a statistic—it’s a reality that challenges our assumptions about dangerous relationships. If you’ve ever read about these findings in academic journals, you might have felt a sense of distance. But hearing it discussed openly, as Saad does, brings the shock home. There’s a difference between reading about risk factors and realizing that, for many women, the most dangerous person is someone they know and trust.
So why does this pattern exist? Evolutionary Psychology offers a framework for understanding these uncomfortable truths. Instead of focusing solely on surface-level explanations, evolutionary scientists look for patterns that persist across cultures and eras. They ask: What ultimate causes drive these behaviors? Why do similar risks appear in both the animal kingdom and human society?
For example, Daly & Wilson’s Homicide study found that the risk of child abuse is up to 100 times higher when a stepparent is present, compared to a biological parent. This pattern isn’t unique to one culture or time period—it’s a recurring theme, suggesting evolved tendencies that shape human behavior. Similarly, men’s higher reported desire for sexual variety, observed in studies worldwide, may help explain certain risk factors in relationships.
Discussing these findings openly can be controversial. As Dr. Saad notes, some knowledge is seen as “dangerous”—especially when it challenges prevailing ideologies or social science taboos. Yet, he insists on the importance of scientific honesty. In his words:
Dr. Gad Saad: “There should be nothing that is off limits for people to do research on.”
It’s crucial to remember that explaining why certain risks exist is not the same as excusing harmful behavior. Understanding the evolutionary roots of intimate partner violence and dangerous relationships can help us address these problems more effectively, rather than ignoring or suppressing uncomfortable truths.
The chart above visualizes what studies like Daly & Wilson’s have found: across vastly different societies, the risk of harm from an intimate partner far exceeds the risk from strangers. This is not just a local or modern phenomenon—it’s a human one, shaped by our evolutionary past.
Why Monogamy Isn’t ‘Natural’? Nuance, Science, and Societal Ideals
If you’ve ever wondered why the idea of lifelong monogamy sometimes feels at odds with human behavior, you’re not alone. Evolutionary Psychology, as discussed by Dr. Gad Saad, offers a lens that challenges the belief that monogamy is our natural default (0.30-0.31). Across cultures and time, sexual behavior studies reveal a more complicated story—one that’s not always comfortable to hear.
Debunking the “Natural Monogamy” Myth
Let’s start with the basics. Many societies treat monogamy as a given, almost a moral axiom. But research shows that this isn’t quite accurate. According to Dr. Saad, “the idea that monogamy is natural is not true” (0.30-0.31). Multiple longitudinal studies and cross-cultural surveys consistently find that men, on average, express a greater desire for multiple sexual partners (0.34-0.36). This is not just a Western phenomenon—it’s seen in data from around the world.
Evolutionary Drives: Not Just a Male Story
But here’s where it gets nuanced. While men may show higher average interest in sexual variety, women are not exempt from these evolutionary drives. Dr. Saad points out that “women too have evolved a very strong desire for sexual variety” (0.46-0.49). The difference is often in degree, not kind. For example, cheating statistics indicate that women’s likelihood to cheat increases at certain points in their lifecycle or when their mate value changes (0.51-0.54). This isn’t about blaming or excusing anyone—it’s about understanding the underlying science.
Mate Desirability and Assortative Mating
How do people choose partners? Evolutionary Psychology suggests we often assortatively mate based on perceived value—a concept Dr. Saad calls the “mate desirability score” (0.56-0.59). For women, social status tends to rank as the most important attribute (1.07-1.09). People generally seek partners with similar overall “scores,” especially in key areas like status, looks, or resources. Pairing an “87” with a “36,” as Dr. Saad puts it, can create relationship stress and misaligned expectations (1.11-1.16).
| Finding | Details |
|---|---|
| Men’s Interest in Sexual Variety | Consistently higher across cultures (sexual behavior studies) |
| Women’s Cheating Likelihood | Increases at certain lifecycle points or mate value changes |
| Mate Desirability Scores | Partners tend to match on overall “score,” especially social status |
Societal Ideals vs. Evolutionary Realities
This is where things get tricky. Society often expects us to follow strict monogamous norms, but our evolutionary instincts can pull us in different directions. The tension between these forces can lead to relationship stress, secrecy, and even infidelity. As Dr. Saad notes, “Explaining why it might make evolutionary sense to cheat doesn’t mean I’m justifying it” (0.39-0.44). This distinction is crucial—understanding the science doesn’t excuse bad behavior, but it does help explain why these issues persist.
Dr. Gad Saad: “Explaining why it might make evolutionary sense to cheat doesn’t mean I’m justifying it.”
When Science Challenges Comfort Zones
Discussing these findings can be uncomfortable. In my own experience, sharing this research at a dinner with friends led to some awkward silences and heated debates. People often react strongly when science challenges deeply held cultural beliefs. But as Dr. Saad warns (0.21-0.27), avoiding knowledge just because it doesn’t fit our ideology is a dangerous principle.
Ultimately, Evolutionary Psychology doesn’t dictate how you should live—it simply offers insight into why you (and those around you) might feel pulled in more than one direction when it comes to love, sex, and commitment.
The Cinderella Principle: Stepparents, Evolution, and a Hundredfold Risk
When you think about the biggest risk factors for child abuse, what comes to mind? Most people—maybe even you—would guess things like parental alcoholism, a history of abuse in the family, or poverty. These are all reasonable answers, and they do play a role. But as Dr. Gad Saad points out in his lectures on Evolutionary Psychology (8.52-9.31), the data tells a different and far more uncomfortable story. The presence of a stepparent in the home is, by a staggering margin, the number one predictor of child abuse. In fact, the risk is not just a little higher—it’s a hundred times higher compared to homes with two biological parents.
To put this in perspective, Dr. Saad explains the concept of an odds ratio in scientific research (9.34-9.59). If a new drug is 20% more effective than a placebo, that’s considered a big deal—a 1.2 odds ratio. But in the case of stepfamilies and child abuse, the odds ratio is 1 to 100. As Saad says, “
the number one predictor [of child abuse] is a hundredfold more predictive than anything… if there is a stepparent in the family.
” This is not a minor statistical blip; it’s an astronomical effect, far beyond what most people would expect from common-sense risk factors.
Why is this the case? Here’s where evolutionary psychology and the so-called Cinderella effect come into play. The Cinderella story isn’t just a fairy tale about a mean stepmother. It’s a universal allegory that reflects a deep evolutionary reality. In the fable, the stepmother is cruel only to her stepdaughter, while treating her own biological children well. This pattern is not unique to humans. Research by Daly & Wilson and others has shown that, across cultures and history, children living with a stepparent face much higher risks of abuse and neglect.
To understand why, Saad draws a parallel with the animal kingdom—specifically, lion prides (10.41-12.50). When new male lions take over a pride, the first thing they do is kill all the cubs that aren’t theirs. This systematic infanticide ensures that the new males don’t waste resources raising offspring that don’t carry their genes. While humans are not lions, the evolutionary logic is similar: we are a biparental species, and our brains have evolved to favor our own genetic offspring. This doesn’t mean every stepparent is dangerous, but it does explain why, statistically, the risk is so much higher.
Of course, this is a deeply uncomfortable truth, especially in today’s world where blended families are common and often loving. It’s important to remember that science is explanation, not excuse (13.03-13.31). As Saad puts it, “an oncologist studies cancer—that doesn’t mean they are for cancer.” Understanding the evolutionary roots of the Cinderella effect helps us recognize patterns and risks, not justify harmful behavior.
So, how does this knowledge affect the way we think about modern stepfamilies? It’s a tough question. On one hand, it highlights the need for awareness and support. On the other, it forces us to confront the uncomfortable reality that some of our most persistent social problems have deep evolutionary roots. The Cinderella effect isn’t just a story—it’s a window into the complex, sometimes troubling, ways our biology shapes our behavior.
| Risk Factor / Analogy | Key Finding |
|---|---|
| Child abuse risk in stepfamilies | 100x higher than in two-biological-parent homes (odds ratio: 1 to 100) |
| Lion prides (animal kingdom) | Systematic infanticide by incoming males after dominance change |
| Stepfamilies and abuse rates | Consistent cross-cultural, cross-historical pattern (Daly & Wilson) |
Evolutionary Psychology vs. ‘Forbidden Knowledge’: When Science Becomes Taboo
If you care about truth in science, you’ll quickly learn that not every question is welcomed with open arms. Evolutionary Psychology, especially as championed by Dr. Gad Saad, sits at the heart of this scientific controversy. The field’s willingness to explore uncomfortable topics—like sex differences science or group differences—often puts researchers on a collision course with what society deems “acceptable” knowledge.
Science’s Real Job: Ask Every Question, Even the Uncomfortable Ones
At its core, science is about curiosity. It’s about asking questions, even when those questions make people squirm. Dr. Saad is vocal about this responsibility. He argues that there should be no forbidden knowledge in science, as long as research is conducted ethically and with an open mind (2:43-3:14). The scientific method is designed to challenge our assumptions, not reinforce our comfort zones.
Dr. Gad Saad: “Truth is provisional in that whatever we might have thought was true 300 years ago, we have the epistemological humility to say, oh, we were wrong – there’s a new truth.” (2:48-2:56)
This humility is essential. Science is always evolving. What you believe today might be overturned by new data tomorrow. That’s not a weakness—it’s the strength of the scientific process.
Personal Costs: Pushing Back Against Groupthink
If you’ve ever challenged the consensus in a classroom or meeting, you know it’s rarely a smooth ride. Dr. Saad himself admits that pushing back against academic groupthink in graduate school cost him friends, but it also led to his most important breakthroughs. Sometimes, the price of honest inquiry is a few awkward silences—or even lost dinner invitations. But for those who value truth in science, it’s a price worth paying.
Why Some Topics Are Career Killers
Certain areas of research—especially those involving racial or sex differences—are considered radioactive. Dr. Saad points out that simply studying group differences can be enough to end a promising academic career (3:41-3:56). The risk isn’t just theoretical. He notes that if your research finds women outperforming men, you’re celebrated. If the reverse is true, you’re told to keep quiet (3:59-4:16). This double standard is not just unfair; it’s anti-scientific.
The Sociopolitical Minefield
Navigating the line between scientific curiosity and accusations of discrimination is tricky. The mere act of investigating sex differences science can get you labeled, regardless of your actual findings. Yet, as Dr. Saad explains, evolutionary psychology doesn’t make value judgments—it simply reports what the data show. Men and women are similar in many ways, but there are also systematic differences, shaped by evolution and biology (4:20-4:39).
Real-World Example: Sex Differences in Evolutionary Psychology
Evolutionary Psychology has repeatedly shown that men and women, on average, excel at different tasks. These aren’t judgments—they’re observations rooted in biology. Still, even acknowledging these differences can spark outrage among otherwise rational academics. Dr. Saad recalls his “Eureka moment” when he realized how even highly educated professors could deny what seems obvious to a child: that sex differences exist (4:39-5:16).
- Research on group differences is often considered career-ending.
- Cross-cultural data, like the Cinderella effect, challenges single-culture assumptions.
- Dr. Saad’s awards, including the Darwinism Applied Award, highlight his impact despite controversy.
Ultimately, open inquiry—even into taboo topics—is essential for progress. Suppressing uncomfortable truths doesn’t make them disappear; it only blinds us to reality. As Dr. Saad’s career shows, the pursuit of truth in science is rarely easy, but it’s always necessary.
Evolutionary Behavioral Science Goes to Market: Darwinian Consumption in Action
When you think about evolutionary psychology, your mind might jump to primal instincts, aggression, or even crime. But what if I told you that the same evolutionary forces shaping violence also explain why you crave chocolate, splurge on luxury cars, or can’t resist that midnight online shopping spree? This is where Gad Saad—a leading voice in marketing psychology—steps in, transforming how we understand consumer behavior through the lens of Darwinian Consumption.
Dr. Saad, a Professor of Marketing at Concordia University and former holder of the Research Chair in Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences and Darwinian Consumption (2008-2018), didn’t start out studying shopping habits. In fact, as he describes in his lectures (5.23-5.26), evolutionary behavioral science was once focused on topics like violence and criminality. He credits his “Eureka moment” to reading Homicide by Martin Daly and Margo Wilson, which applied evolutionary logic to patterns of crime across cultures and eras (7.01-7.32). The key insight? Some behaviors are so universal, they can’t be explained by culture or era alone—they’re rooted in our evolutionary past.
So, how did this thinking leap from crime scenes to shopping carts? Dr. Saad realized that if evolutionary psychology could explain violence, it could also decode why we buy what we buy. He founded the field of Darwinian Consumption, blending evolutionary logic with consumer science to reveal the hidden instincts behind our everyday purchases.
Why Do We Buy? It’s Not Always Rational
Traditional behaviorism, as Saad explains (5.30-5.59), saw human actions as the result of stimulus and response—think Pavlov’s dogs. But evolutionary psychology digs deeper, asking: Why do certain stimuli trigger such powerful responses? Why do calorie-rich foods, flashy gadgets, or status symbols like luxury cars have such universal appeal? The answer, research shows, is that these preferences reflect ancient survival and mating strategies, not just modern marketing tricks.
As Dr. Saad puts it:
“All that an evolutionary behavioral scientist does is… try to look for ultimate Darwinian signatures.”
(9.13-9.17)
The Consuming Instinct: Ancient Drives, Modern Spending
In his acclaimed book, The Consuming Instinct, Saad explores how our prehistoric brains still drive our choices today. From the snacks you crave to the brands you flaunt, your “inner hunter-gatherer” is alive and well—often leading you to buy things for reasons you can’t quite articulate. Studies indicate that consumer choices, from food to media, reflect evolutionary drives as much as, or more than, cultural fads.
Recognition and Reach: Science That Connects
Dr. Saad’s impact goes far beyond academia. He’s received the Darwinism Applied Award, the President’s Media Outreach Award, and his YouTube channel, The Saad Truth, has racked up over 14 million views. His work bridges the gap between research and real life, helping millions understand why their brains—and wallets—work the way they do.
Personal Tangent: Testing the Theory
As someone who’s fallen victim to late-night impulse buys, I’ve found Saad’s ideas uncomfortably accurate. That “need” for the latest gadget? It’s not just clever advertising—it’s my evolutionary programming at work, fooling me into thinking I’m hunting for survival, not just another distraction.
Gad Saad: Darwinian Consumption at a Glance
Professor of Marketing
Concordia University
Research Chair
Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences
Books
The Consuming Instinct
Awards
Darwinism Applied
YouTube: The Saad Truth — 14M+ views
Academic Role
Research
Books
Awards
Wild Card: The Evolutionary Psychologist’s Guide to Awkward Dinner Parties and Stepping on Toes
There’s a reason evolutionary psychology, especially as explained by Dr. Gad Saad, is the ultimate wild card at any dinner party. Bring up the Cinderella effect or sex differences, and you’ll quickly discover just how fast a lively gathering can turn into an awkward science showdown. If you’ve ever wondered why discussing human nature can make people squirm, you’re not alone. Evolutionary psychology has a knack for exposing the uncomfortable truths we’d rather keep under wraps—especially when family, food, and tradition collide.
Let’s start with a classic: the Cinderella effect. Imagine you’re at Thanksgiving, and you decide to explain why the story of Cinderella resonates across cultures. As Dr. Saad notes, the “nasty stepmother” trope isn’t just a fairy tale—it reflects an evolutionary principle (10.16-10.25). In many species, including humans, step-parents may not invest as much in non-biological children. This isn’t about villainizing anyone; it’s about understanding the deep-rooted patterns that shape behavior. Try telling your aunt that, and watch as family mythmaking ensues—suddenly, every childhood slight is reinterpreted through an evolutionary lens.
Why does this spark so much discomfort? Research shows that social resistance to evolutionary psychology reveals the tenacity of cultural taboos and a real unease with scientific explanations for behavior. As Dr. Saad puts it,
“Just admitting that there are innate and evolved sex differences is a dreadful thing to say in the social sciences.”
This isn’t just theory; it’s lived experience for anyone who’s ever been asked to “keep it light” at a dinner party after mentioning sex differences or parental investment.
Now, picture an evolutionary psychologist at a speed dating event. What questions would they ask? Instead of “What’s your favorite movie?” you might hear, “How do you feel about parental investment theory?” or “Do you think mate desirability is shaped more by status or resource availability?” It’s not exactly small talk, but it does get to the heart of what drives attraction and decision-making—topics Dr. Saad has explored extensively in his research on consumer behavior and evolutionary psychology.
Sometimes, the awkwardness isn’t just about big topics. Ever find yourself wondering if your shopping cravings are evolutionary quirks? You’re not alone. Dr. Saad’s work suggests that even our consumer choices can be traced back to ancient survival strategies. Maybe that urge to splurge is less about modern marketing and more about signaling status or resource acquisition—a high school popularity contest with roots in the savannah.
Of course, not everyone appreciates these insights. Informal tallies suggest that dinner invitations tend to dwindle after you bring up step-parent risk or the science of sexual variety. And if you’re an evolutionary psychologist, you’re probably asked not to mention sex differences at social events—nearly always, according to those in the field.
But here’s the thing: evolutionary psychology isn’t meant to be a dinner table crowd-pleaser. It’s about confronting taboos and facing awkward truths, seeing humanity as it really is—warts, wonders, controversies and all. Knowing the science is one thing; living with what it implies is another. The more you learn, the harder it is to pretend life is a simple, rational game. Awkwardness, it turns out, isn’t a bug—it’s a feature of grappling with human nature in all its messy, fascinating complexity.
Conclusion: What Embracing Evolutionary Psychology Actually Means for You (and for Science)
When you first encounter the ideas behind Evolutionary Psychology, it can feel like stepping into uncomfortable territory. Dr. Gad Saad, a leading voice in this field, doesn’t shy away from the awkward questions. Instead, he encourages us to look directly at the patterns that shape human behavior—even when those patterns challenge our assumptions or make us uneasy (13.11-13.37). Accepting evolutionary explanations doesn’t mean excusing bad behavior or reducing people to their instincts. It means gaining self-knowledge and using that insight to make wiser decisions, both in our personal lives and as a society.
Seeing Patterns, Solving Problems
One of the most powerful takeaways from evolutionary psychology is the freedom to see patterns honestly. As Dr. Saad explains, an oncologist studies cancer not because they support it, but because understanding the disease is the first step to fighting it (13.11-13.23). In the same way, if we want to tackle difficult social issues—like child abuse or interpersonal violence—we have to be willing to look at the data, even if it’s uncomfortable. For example, research shows that step-parenthood is a significant predictor of child abuse. That’s not an accusation; it’s a valuable insight that can inform prevention and intervention strategies (13.23-13.37).
Wrestling with Discomfort: The Value of Tough Conversations
It’s tempting to turn away from findings that unsettle us. But ignoring difficult questions doesn’t make them disappear. In fact, facing them head-on is often the only way to build understanding and, sometimes, empathy. Dr. Saad’s work is a call to have those awkward conversations, whether they’re about family dynamics, gender differences, or the realities of human aggression. As he points out, the most dangerous person in a woman’s life—across cultures and eras—is not a stranger, but often someone close to her (13.41-14.19). This insight isn’t meant to frighten, but to inform and empower.
Practical Tools for Better Decision Making
Embracing evolutionary psychology isn’t just about academic debates. It’s about using what we learn to make better choices, from our relationships to our purchasing habits. Dr. Saad’s research, including his books like The Consuming Instinct, shows how evolutionary drives influence everything from mate selection to consumer behavior. When you understand these forces, you’re better equipped to navigate modern life’s complexities—without being a slave to your biology.
Dr. Saad’s Impact: Challenging Taboos and Modeling Humility
With millions of YouTube views and a global following, Dr. Saad has brought evolutionary psychology into the public conversation. His willingness to challenge taboos and invite open dialogue has earned him recognition far beyond academia. As the former Concordia University Research Chair and a recipient of multiple awards, he’s modeled what it means to blend rigorous science with accessible, honest communication.
The Ongoing Journey
Embracing evolutionary psychology is not about reaching a final answer. It’s about committing to an ongoing process of inquiry—one that resists cultural complacency and values truth over comfort. As Dr. Saad puts it:
Dr. Gad Saad: “There are wonderful things to discover about human nature.”
To embrace this field is to accept both the beauty and the challenge of being human. The real risk isn’t in asking hard questions—it’s in ignoring them.
FAQ: Evolutionary Psychology, Gad Saad, and the Science of Human Nature
Curious about evolutionary psychology, Dr. Gad Saad’s research, or how these ideas shape our understanding of human behavior? This FAQ brings together the most frequently asked questions, offering clear, research-backed answers and resources for deeper exploration. Whether you’re new to the topic or looking to challenge your own assumptions, you’ll find straightforward insights here.
What is evolutionary psychology, and how does it explain everyday human behaviors?
Evolutionary psychology is the scientific study of how evolutionary processes—like natural and sexual selection—have shaped the human mind and behavior. It asks why certain patterns, preferences, or social dynamics exist by tracing them back to survival or reproductive advantages in our ancestral past. For example, research shows that the presence of a stepparent in the home increases the risk of child abuse by a factor of 100, a pattern seen across cultures and time. This suggests deep evolutionary roots in parental investment and kin selection, helping explain why some behaviors persist even when they seem uncomfortable or controversial today.
Who is Dr. Gad Saad, and why is his research influential?
Dr. Gad Saad is a professor of marketing at Concordia University and a leading voice in evolutionary psychology. He’s known for applying evolutionary principles to consumer behavior, revealing why we buy what we buy and how our choices are influenced by ancient drives. Saad’s books, such as The Consuming Instinct and The Parasitic Mind, have reached wide audiences, and his YouTube channel, The Saad Truth, has over 14 million views. His willingness to address controversial topics with scientific rigor has made him both influential and, at times, a lightning rod for debate.
Is evolutionary psychology just an excuse for controversial behavior?
This is a common misconception. Evolutionary psychology explains the origins of behaviors; it does not justify them. As Dr. Saad often emphasizes, understanding why certain tendencies exist—like infidelity or aggression—doesn’t mean we endorse them. Instead, it gives us tools to address real-world problems more honestly. As he puts it:
“If you want to tackle [a problem], you have to study it honestly.”
How has Dr. Saad’s research changed what we know about consumer behavior?
Saad’s work has shown that many consumer choices are rooted in evolved psychological mechanisms. For instance, mate selection, status signaling, and even our food preferences can be traced to evolutionary pressures. His research, detailed in books like Darwinian Consumption, has helped marketers and psychologists alike understand why certain products, brands, or trends resonate so deeply with us.
Are there any criticisms of evolutionary psychology or Dr. Saad’s approach?
Yes, some critics argue that evolutionary psychology can be reductionist or that it risks reinforcing stereotypes. Others challenge the field’s reliance on cross-cultural patterns or question the testability of certain hypotheses. Dr. Saad addresses these concerns by grounding his arguments in empirical data and emphasizing the importance of open, honest debate—even when findings are uncomfortable or challenge prevailing ideologies.
Where can I find more about Dr. Saad’s work and ideas?
To dive deeper, check out Dr. Saad’s books: The Consuming Instinct, Darwinian Consumption, and The Parasitic Mind. His YouTube channel, The Saad Truth, offers accessible discussions on evolutionary psychology and current events. For academic insights, his research papers and public lectures are also widely available online.
In the end, evolutionary psychology—especially as explored by Gad Saad—invites you to look beneath the surface of human nature. It challenges you to confront uncomfortable truths, ask tough questions, and, above all, to study the world honestly, even when the answers are not what you expect.
TL;DR: Evolutionary psychology, as explained by Dr. Gad Saad, digs into humanity’s discomforts and taboos—highlighting how our evolutionary story shapes relationships, risks, and even the science we allow ourselves to explore. Read on if you’re ready to embrace nuance.
A big shoutout to The Diary Of A CEO for their incredibly insightful content. Be sure to check it out here: https://youtu.be/1g9VX34MSUA?si=py5CrbfkCaQ4MWt4.
